delta wrote:I don't think anybody is missing out.
Trigger wrote:[quote="delta"]I don't think anybody is missing out.
lanyard wrote:The challenge is this portion of the framework is flexible but there is only opinion to respond to. Maybe they include some questions in the survey, but these will likely be insufficient to provide guidance.
The fact we got splits in the first place can be listed as a moment of progression and liberalization at the DNR. This period has been marked by 3 wood ducks, 2 hen mallards, full limits of divers, open water hunting, and a one week earlier start of the season
Previously it was the 20 years it took to go from noon to half hour before sunrise.
I think positive mention of these accomplishments with a desire for augmented splits might go a long way in getting things adjusted, rather than a "I know we wanted to get here, but now that we've arrived, this sucks"
gimpfinger wrote:I had no problems with the first split. Three days on then five off. Locals didn't get piss pounded for over a week, more of a chance at better bwt numbers and less chance for a good front to blow early migrants through.
Team Power Dump
Fish Felon wrote:h2ofwlr wrote:But their concern is too many hunters will head to the MS river with small SE zone.
So the rest of the Southern third of the state should lose out on prime hunting time in early October in order to spread out pressure for the approximately 27 guys that hunt the river those last couple weeks?
gimpfinger wrote:[quote="Trigger"][quote="delta"]I don't think anybody is missing out.
Bailey wrote:[quote="gimpfinger"][quote="Trigger"][quote="delta"]I don't think anybody is missing out.
gimpfinger wrote:[quote="Bailey"][quote="gimpfinger"][quote="Trigger"][quote="delta"]I don't think anybody is missing out.
Return to “MNFOWL's Misguided Children”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests