^^^^
Redcoat!!
h2ofwlr wrote:^^^^ So by your stance I could legally go buy 30 head of cattle and put a fence around a 160 Acre WPA and graze my cattle, not get a permit, not pay the Feds anything, eh? As that amounts to what you are saying about public land that none of use should have to pay to use the public land. Heck there is Carver park a mere 8 miles from me where I could run 250 head of cattle, I better get it done before someone beats me to it!
And another point, every one that enters a Nation Park needs to buy a pass to enter, don't they? These monies help to pay for the upkeep and improvments to tour NPs. So there is indeed precedence for it. And I think this is what the Dept of Interior should do too with NWRs, meaning to enter you need to have bought a current Federal duck stamp, since it is this $ raised by the stamp that bought the land and does the maintenance.
As for what Shawn posted up with that video.... what is it that they always say? Oh yes, follow the money trail if you really want to know what is going on. If nothing else Ried just reinforces my view of politicians in general.
But it still comes back to this: Bundy is not paying for the use of the land. So should his cattle be on it these last 20 years to begin with?
shnelson wrote:I think "our land" was lost when the first deed was created.
D.T. Hammer wrote:. Now he is a criminal, according to fowler.
Stute Slap wrote:Pinko!!
Return to “MNFOWL's Misguided Children”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests