Minnesota Waterfowl Hunting

Putting it in the booklet would undoubtably be more cost effective but I'm saying that in a state that deems in necessary to have 3 "non-toxic shot" signs in the public areas.

I just want to spend more money

Edit: by in public areas I mean where you generally park before you walk in.

The article is likely very similar to foulers daily hunt checklist. Surely, all 11 items are accomplished every hunt...including several 911 calls.

If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

h2ofwlr wrote:If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

If I won the powerball I wouldn't care what other hunters did on public land anymore.

Fish Felon wrote:

h2ofwlr wrote:If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

If I won the powerball I wouldn't care what other hunters did on public land anymore.

That's right I would know what public land looks like anymore.

h2ofwlr wrote:If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

What good would it do? You pay for it, yet you are the one who tried to downwind me on opener. So if the guy who pays for the ethics column to be printed doesn't abide by the ethics printed, should we all abide by those same ethics? Or does the guy with the money gets free pass?

Let your version go Trigger.... as it is getting real old like left over turkey from Thanksgiving still in your refg.

Trigger wrote:...but life is to short to be so concerned with shooting a couple ducks that getting mad at someone who clearly doesn't know better is even a possibility for me.

Trigger wrote:

h2ofwlr wrote:If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

What good would it do? You pay for it, yet you are the one who tried to downwind me on opener. So if the guy who pays for the ethics column to be printed doesn't abide by the ethics printed, should we all abide by those same ethics? Or does the guy with the money gets free pass?

Trigger wrote:

h2ofwlr wrote:If I won Powerball I'd pay for it to be in the waterfowl booklet.

What good would it do? You pay for it, yet you are the one who tried to downwind me on opener. So if the guy who pays for the ethics column to be printed doesn't abide by the ethics printed, should we all abide by those same ethics? Or does the guy with the money gets free pass?

What's the whole story?? I always figured fouler to be "that guy" in the field. It's bad enough he's a thief...now we hear he's a dick-like hunter as well. I've always been warned by people that were burned by foulers dishonest ways...mainly...DO NOT EVER tell him where you're hunting....EVER!!

Geeze, someone wanna make a 11 rules for posting on a duck forum guide?