Page 119 of 488
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:29 am
by Fish Felon
Harold Houck wrote:Fish Felon wrote:Harold Houck wrote:Not sure in this pic I measured from my chin to the top of my head it was right about 1 inch. The fish was 4 inches measured in the pic. I measured my head, from top to chin in real time its approx 11" so the fish is roughly 44-45 inches.
You realize the fish is quite a bit in front of your head though right?
Regardless, Nice fish!
Right the way I measured it that does not matter. My head measured in the picture and my head in real-time is the same regardless of depth, same with the fish.
I can't tell if you're joking or not...
Next time you catch a nice pike take a traditional pic like the one you posted and then take a second picture from the same vantage point with your buddy holding the fish a few feet behind you.
Then use your same unit of measurement, your head, and measure the fish in each picture. Newsflash: they will be different lengths. How in the phuck would depth not matter?
Jason Mitchell's face is 10" from top to bottom...so by my calculations he's holding an approximate 50" walleye. Nice fish Jason!
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:09 am
by deet
Harold Houck wrote:This one was bigger
47"
Come on, Harold. Just admit you're trying to get a rise out of the measurement police.
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:18 am
by deet
Harold Houck wrote:Fish Felon wrote:Harold Houck wrote:Not sure in this pic I measured from my chin to the top of my head it was right about 1 inch. The fish was 4 inches measured in the pic. I measured my head, from top to chin in real time its approx 11" so the fish is roughly 44-45 inches.
You realize the fish is quite a bit in front of your head though right?
Regardless, Nice fish!
Right the way I measured it that does not matter. My head measured in the picture and my head in real-time is the same regardless of depth, same with the fish.
I guess this means the trees in the background are all roughly 10 - 13 inches tall in real life.
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:23 am
by Harold Houck
[/quote]I guess this means the trees in the background are all roughly 10 - 13 inches tall in real life.[/quote]
Right but you have to use PI and then allow for the curvature of the earth to calculate that.
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 8:57 am
by deet
Makes perfect sense now.
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:23 am
by Fish Felon
Harold Houck wrote:Right but you have to use PI and then allow for the curvature of the earth to calculate that.
You were joking, got it. Well played.
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:46 am
by Lars30
Harold Houck wrote:This one was bigger
47"
Get a tape that starts with "0" and works its way up. Theoretically speaking a 47 inch Pike will be over 30 pounds, that one is not close, nice fish and probably a nice fight. When you get one over 40 you'll know, should be around 20 pounds. A lot of people get excited with big fish and tend to over do it a tad
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:15 pm
by kwackkillncrew
Copper river Reds. Let the fishing season begin
Sent while partying
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:50 am
by Perch_44
Re: Post a picture you took in the last week.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:55 am
by Stute Slap
You eat them?
toes, wtf?