Trying to objectively look at it without letting my personal favorable bias towards Trump totally skew my take.....
I'm fine with blaming Trump for most of the responsibility for the lack of response, if that's what we're doing.
On the other hand the media deserves some of the blame for the lack of response for how sensationalized, partisan, and untrustworthy they've become.
If this same pandemic took place in the 1960's would anyone questioned the severity of the looming crisis after being informed by the media at that time? Back when our media sources were journalists and operated with an ethical obligation to cover stories and report them in a trustworthy, responsible, and dignified way to the general public?
No one would have questioned this had it been reported back then.....certainly not the President. LBJ read newspapers on the shitter and took the info reported in them the same as gospel.
Here's where we could go round and round lanyard if we want to let our biases get the better of us.....
I could argue that it's not that unreasonable for Trump to not take this virus seriously until it reached the point of, "Oh Fukc, this one is actually Legit." A few months ago Trump had just started WWIII by bombing an Iranian General and we were all going to die.....two or three months before that he resurrected ISIS and in one false swoop wiped out the Kurds by pulling troops and letting Turkey come at them....and Trump started WWIII and we were all going to do die....and most recently....as in it just fukcing happened, the media jizzed all over themselves for months over the thought of Trump getting ousted after impeachment when anyone with half a brain new there was Zero Chance the Senate was going to hang him out try and give him the boot from office.....and Trump endured all of that over a third party unknown whistleblowers paraphrased "transcript" of what he said on a phone call to Ukraine.....when the Democratic nominee is on video as VP bragging about extorting the Ukranian president by withholding a billion dollars in aid in exchange for them firing a prosecutor he personally wanted gone....while coincidentally his kid was on the board of a Ukranin Gas Holding Company that just so happened to be under investigation for fraud and embezzlement of funds....with no one really aware of this being the case at the time......yet the media's attitude toward Biden? Totally cool! Good old Uncle Joe....no biggie that he blatantly engaged in the exact behavior Trump was accused of only a thousand times worse and a million times more out in the open and blatant.
So do I think it's that unreasonable for Trump to take this story as another sensationalized bunch of Bullshit story like they have pretty much all been non-stop since he got into office?
No. No I do not Blame him. I blame him more for not having a team around him that tries to objectively review what's in the 24/7 news sphere knowing that there's no way he can at this point, and I blame that no less than 50/50 on him and the media equally.
You can disagree with that and I'm fine with it because you're also not going to be wrong....your take will be just as correct and on point as mine, maybe a little more, maybe a little less, but not enough to not be able to feel it's not inaccurate to state that neither of us are wrong more so than both of us are right since we're looking at it and engaging in partisan politics but being and least somewhat reasonable about it.
In my opinion, once you factor in the media aspect of it.....or take that aspect out of this altogether and simply look at the nature of the virus itself.....
This thing is totally new. It's not like H1N1 under Obama where it was a known pathogen tests had already been developed and around for a long time.
The reality of the situation is that no president would've done much better or worse trying to address this. We didn't know exactly what was happening because it's China. They have state TV and state everything so it's hard to trust what is coming out of there. Secondly, even if we knew then what we know now and realized the Chinese response to it was actually very impressive. It still doesn't apply here since there's Zero Chance even a tenth of the measures they took are even possible due to culture, government, healthcare system, etc., differences.
All in all, what's the difference between a hypothetical president handling this thing perfectly and our actual President handling this in real time?
A higher percentage of tests being done earlier and through now with the distinction between the two being there's little to no distinction in how this pandemic will hit us. Three months ago this shit didn't even exist for all intensive purposes. I didn't take it very seriously either in large part because of how badly our media fukcing sucks.
Joe Rogan.....a friggin' podcast by Joe Rogan is what got myself and like half the country to wake up and realize this shit is serious. What does that tell you about how truly awful our media is? It's to the point where they've cried wolf so many times now and are so hysteria driven that having them report how serious the concern over Covid-19 was, was actually counterproductive to having people take it seriously. That's how bad they suck.
Would Obama been more prepared for this? Yes. Why? Because he didn't have the love-hate relationship with the media that Trump and the media have. The media actually wanted Obama to succeed. In turn, he could trust the media. With Trump the jizzed themselves over him getting impeached and have not only rooted against him but have been out after him ever since he started running and became a serious candidate they had to consider.
In the end Obama being on top of this much better amounts to a slightly better idea of how widespread the infection is at this point at that's it. It still wouldn't change anything....speeding up or slowing down the infection rate.....it'd just give us a slightly better picture at this point. And that picture would still be the same as it is now...alarming.