User avatar
Fish Felon
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 5871
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:22 pm

New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:17 pm

New Minnesota DNR deer leader wants herds to thrive

Oh, he does!? Oh thank god! I was really worried he'd want something else. Whew! That's a relief.

Image

Adam Murkowski, the new DNR big game program manager, has had a passion for deer hunting and deer biology since his youth. Here he posed with a buck replica at DNR headquarters in St. Paul. — JERRY HOLT

By TONY KENNEDY , STAR TRIBUNE
January 26, 2016 - 8:23 PM


Keeping chronic wasting disease (CWD) out of Minnesota and emphasizing habitat as a way to boost the state’s whitetail herd are among the chief concerns of the new deer leader at the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Adam Murkowski, an avid bow hunter from a small Wisconsin town, also told the Star Tribune in an interview this week that his initial to-do list includes writing Minnesota’s first statewide deer management plan ever.

Working as Vermont’s deer czar from 2012 to 2015, he dwelled on sharing data with deer hunters that was both understandable and pertinent. He wants to do the same here.

“In Vermont we had good data and good buy-in,” Murkowski said. “Deep down, we all want what’s best for deer hunting.”

Addressing the state’s declining moose population and managing three small herds of wild elk in northwestern Minnesota also falls on Murkowski, who is 29 but looks younger. He replaces Leslie McInenly, a fellow graduate of the wildlife ecology program at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. The two now sit next to each other on the second floor of DNR headquarters in St. Paul. McInenly was promoted to be the wildlife section’s forest habitat team supervisor.

She held the big game job for three years during tense times over low deer counts and the setting of deer population goals around the state. Finally, legislators last year ordered a review of DNR deer management by the state’s Office of the Legislative Auditor.

Murkowski said he’s looking forward to the findings, due out in a couple of months. The results should give the agency an opportunity to re-emphasize what it has been doing well and make changes for improvement, he said. During the wait, he will be busy setting hunting regulations by permit area for 2016. As always, the harvest strategy will depend on last season’s kill data, winter severity measurements and herd population surveys.

The new guidelines should be completed by mid-May, and Murkowski is anticipating an expansion of harvest opportunities in certain areas where deer densities look more promising. Still, in some zones Up North, Murkowski said he will stick to a bucks-only approach until herd size improves.

“There should be more opportunities in other areas than there were last year,” he said.

Murkowski said the statewide deer management plan will be apart from any year-to-year or zone-to-zone strategies. Instead, it will be wide in scope and long in vision like the DNR’s new goal-driven pheasant plan or the agency’s existing big-picture plans for moose and elk. It will consider habitat and provide realistic evaluations of how many healthy deer a given landscape can support. If more deer are desired, how can habitat be improved to support them? He plans to launch the project in midyear.

“I’m more interested in doing it right than to be on a timeline,” he said.

Growing up in Marathon City, Wis., near Wausau, Murkowski started hunting deer at age 10, but only on family deer drives.

“They used me as a brush dog,” he said.

His first shots were fired at age 12, when he arrowed his first deer on a family member’s dairy farm. As a teen, he remembers sitting in a tree stand, envisioning working as a deer manager in Madison.

In Vermont, where miles and miles of farmland have been erased by development, deer densities are much lower than they are in the Midwest. Back there, Murkowski said, New England hunters talk extensively about habitat. They aim to protect deer wintering areas, plant winter rye on logging roads for forage and strive for diversity in landscapes. They want their deer to enter each winter in good shape.

“That’s the approach,” Murkowski said. “The conversations always surround deer health.”

He said the emphasis might have paid off last fall when buck kills were up in Vermont despite the harshest winter there in 15 years.

“If we can increase the quantity and quality of deer range, we can have more deer,” he said.

Murkowski has worked on deer projects in Wisconsin, Arkansas, Colorado and North Carolina. Common to all are dichotomies that develop between hunters and resource managers. The individual experiences of a hunter may grow at odds with what’s really going on in broader context, creating communication problems.

Murkowski said he strives to improve communication with hunters by sharing data. As part of his graduate studies at the University of Arkansas-Monticello, he wrote a thesis titled “Communicating Results of Research to Educators and the Public.” The paper concluded that the more relevant you can make information the more efficient you can deliver the message.

“The thing I want to do is bring people together to keep deer healthy,” Murkowski said. “If you can do that, you can deal with the other things.”

Murkowski said his top concern as the DNR’s point person for deer hunting and deer population control is to keep CWD out of the state. In Wisconsin, where he worked just before being hired in Minnesota, the disease has infected an astonishing 40 percent of whitetails living in an infectious zone west of Madison.

Twenty-one other states also have CWD in wild deer. And once established, Murkowski said, the disease is extremely difficult to curtail.

“If you are a Minnesotan who loves deer hunting, taking a proactive approach is something you want to do,” he said. “Right now you have something more precious than gold and that’s a healthy deer herd.”

Tony Kennedy • 612-673-4213
Hate Speech is Free Speech
"Ogaa-Gichi-Manidoo"

User avatar
Drunk_Dynasty
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 2586
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 11:29 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:26 am

Deer are big dumb animals. I wish the thread title was accurate.

cstemig
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 1460
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:53 am

I'm optimistic that with this new blood comes new ideas and some changes. Having an actual hunter in that position is a good thing.
" God is great, beer is good, and people are just frickin crazy!."

Quack
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:44 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:54 am

Not being allowed to take does during bow season in NE MN is idiotic. Thanks DNR

Mallard_maniac
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:33 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:51 am

Quack wrote:Not being allowed to take does during bow season in NE MN is idiotic. Thanks DNR


I'll buy that,

It's not a big deal to me, I wouldn't burn an either-sex archery tag on a doe in NE MN anyway but for new archery hunters (kids, women, new adult male archers) this seems to do more harm than good. You're probably talking an additional 500 (really maybe less) animals total that might be harvested throughout the entire 100 zone during bow season but on the flip side possibly frustrating new hunters. In the long run this seems like a poor investment.

User avatar
9manfan
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:50 pm
Location: S.W. Mn

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:02 pm

cstemig wrote: Having an actual hunter in that position is a good thing.



I remember when Tom Landwehr got his job with the DNR and everyone was happy because he is a fellow duck hunter, now they want to tar and feather the guy.... most of these jobs are a no-win situation job.......
This crowd has gone deadly silent... Cinderella story, out of nowhere, former greenskeeper, now, about to become the Masters Championship. It looks like a mirac- It's in the hole! It's in the hole!~ Carl Spackler

get-n-birdy
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:35 pm

Quack wrote:Not being allowed to take does during bow season in NE MN is idiotic. Thanks DNR


X2!

If it's that bad, just shut deer hunting down completely. It reminds me of letting anglers have one walleye on the big pond over the winter. If it's as bad as they say it is, keep it closed so there's no hooking mortality or any harvest at all. But we all know it's not just about science, it's also about money. Even if it was what was best for the deer herd to close it down, they wouldn't do what's best for the animals, when it would affect the bottom line.

We hunt in 178 and didn't even hunt this year. It was an intensive harvest area for multiple years. I'm no expert that's for sure, but there's no reason there should ever be an intensive harvest area in NE MN where you can harvest 5 deer per person, other than maybe around some cities or in extreme circumstances. Between vehicles, winter, hunters and wolves, deer have enough things to worry about in the NE other than over harvest.
DENNIS ANDERSON, Then, about five years ago, in 2020, there were no more ducks in the state,

HnkrCrash
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 323
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 7:31 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:59 pm

Not being allowed to take does during bow season in NE MN is idiotic.


What's even more idiotic are the greedy, simple-minded, morons who rolled every deer they saw during intensive harvest seasons simply because the DNR said they could and are now surprised by low deer numbers and reduced hunting opportunity.

These idiots sure like to blame the DNR for screwing up "their" deer hunting though. The DNR didn't kill a single deer in these scenarios, hunters did. That being the case, hunters have nobody to blame but themselves for certain areas being decimated.

My hunting zone was unfortunately included in intensive harvest for several consecutive seasons a few years back. Unlike most, however, my party took maybe 1 extra deer per season total. We had the intelligence and foresight to realize that despite what we were allowed to do, if we kill all the deer in years X and Y there won't be any left in year Z.
"The less I know about other people's affairs, the happier I am. I'm not interested in caring about people."
- Ron Swanson

get-n-birdy
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 954
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:07 pm

We were scratching our head those years. There was a lot of deer around. But anyone who hunts northern mn knows the soup can get pretty thin in a hurry. Granted one bad winter and the deer herd can get pounded. Our areas herd made it through the intensive harvest years pretty good. The 2 winters and a pack of wolves keying in on food plots has not been a welcome addition and destroyed the herd. The years of intensive harvest the gun fire was constant opening weekend. Now if you hear a couple shots on the edges of daylight it's surprising.
DENNIS ANDERSON, Then, about five years ago, in 2020, there were no more ducks in the state,

Mallard_maniac
Mergie Marauder
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:33 pm

Re: New MN DNR deer leader wants herds eradicated

Thu Jan 28, 2016 1:47 pm

get-n-birdy wrote:We were scratching our head those years. There was a lot of deer around. But anyone who hunts northern mn knows the soup can get pretty thin in a hurry. Granted one bad winter and the deer herd can get pounded. Our areas herd made it through the intensive harvest years pretty good. The 2 winters and a pack of wolves keying in on food plots has not been a welcome addition and destroyed the herd. The years of intensive harvest the gun fire was constant opening weekend. Now if you hear a couple shots on the edges of daylight it's surprising.


That's about it in bold.....

I live in a "has been" intensive harvest zone. We went from 5 deer to 1(hunters choice) to 1(bucks only, lottery doe) in 2 off seasons. I brought my concern to our local wildlife official and he had some pretty fascinating statistics that debunked my questions. On a statewide level, in intensive harvest zones, the percentage of hunters that took 2 deer was somewhere around 10%. But the percentage of hunters that took 3, 4 or 5 all were under 1%. Long story short, intensive harvest (although perceived to be) wasn't playing a huge role in reduction. I was very much against it until looked at his numbers. There were 2 winters that took a severe toll, as well as the ongoing "predator" issue that we can no longer control.

Return to “MNFOWL's Misguided Children”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests