Quack wrote:Not directly related, but I just read the book 1491.
It’s what archeologists believe the Americas were like before Columbus and the Spaniards started visiting. Populations, governments rose and fell. Wildlife populations were different. The natives are believed to have had a lot more agricultural, wildlife, and forest mgmt going on than just being “nomadic hunter gatherers”
But most importantly… European diseases, primarily smallpox, reduced the population of the Western Hemisphere by about 85%… imagine that…
It was a pretty interesting read, particularly given how the idiotic media sensationalism portrays everything that happens now like it’s a first ever catastrophe.
When Lewis & Clark made it to Mandan.....it was a more populated city than the one they left in St. Louis.
There were some pretty advanced tribes, but there were also some njggerish ones.....the Sioux in particular were loathed by everyone. They were one of two tribes to mess with Lewis & Clark....really the only one since the other involved some wannabe horse theft with the Blackfoot if I remember right. The Sioux basically saw them coming upstream in SD and surrounded them....their first instinct was to kill them and take their shit. Outnumbered and in a staredown with guns drawn against indians without them, eventually both parties were able to back away from one another.
Read anything "Native American" with some suspicion over whether or not what you're reading has been romanticized. Virtually all of what has been written in the past fifty to sixty years is the reverse of "white washing" history.
First off, realize that their is no such thing as "Native American." Their ancestors came here via the Bering Land bridge around 14,000 years ago.....my ancestors came here on a boat within the past 400 years......both represent what amounts to a second in human history, and much less than that of the Earth's history.
The people here before whites were the same as them since people are people. We're inherently good and inherently bad.....inherently driven and inherently lazy.....
Natives warred with one another, massacred each other, were peaceful and civil with one another, had slaves....often with one another....traded with each other....got each other sick with something new at times....and the list of similarities goes on and on.
The most well written history in regards to indians in this country is the old stuff....stuff written around the time it happened to a hundred years ago. People didn't have time to think about creating agendas....there was no "frame everything a certain way for posterity sake," i.e. people didn't write with a bias. Everything back then was pragmatic. The writers were people that if they were eating pork it meant they went back on their property and slaughtered a pig. They felt nothing doing it. It was what it was and was done with little fanfare or emotion.
Any modern writer....anyone who has been groomed and brought up through our modern education system.....wouldn't be able to handle slaughtering a pig. They write based off of emotion because they've been taught that's where good writing stems from.
When it comes to history that isn't the case and why modern history writers are garbage. It's why modern news media is garbage.....everyone feels entitled to put their slant on the stories they tell.
The old indian historians told what happened without any fanfare and as a result were about as impartial as it got. They were much closer to that way of life so when the Sioux killed a bunch of settlers....or the Ojibwa Chippewa massacred all the Sioux from villages named Onamia, Kathio, Vineland, etc., they wrote what happened.....without thinking about what impact their accounts would make from an "equality" standpoint.
Just be careful reading a lot of the indian history since in my opinion....most of it paints them living in this utopian like existence where they were much more advanced than they actually were, much more civil to each other than they actually were, and that whites ruthlessly destroyed them much more vindictively than they did.
Everything was pragmatically done with little fanfare back then.....taking over areas and expanding your territory was the way of the world. Their society wasn't any better than ours is today......people are people....they're good and they're bad.