Fish Felon wrote:[quote="Drunk_Dynasty"][quote="Fish Felon"]One side is trying to stop tech companies from censoring things like the legitimately questionable results of the presidential election, deleting anything related to Hunter Biden's laptop since it's a "Russian Subversive Election Hack," and censoring I dunno....the freaking president of this country from speaking directly to his constituents that he's working on behalf of.....
The other side is for all that bullshit, and you seem to very much be on that side DD.
Regulating big tech companies to allow free speech is technically deregulation in my opinion.
Deregulation that requires more laws? Ok.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro[/quote]
Yup......I get it.....this one is confusing because it's new.....and the public town square has shifted to becoming a privately owned website.....but yes, prior to a billionaire free speech absolutist buying Twitter.....
Wait, there aren't going to be anymore laws because luckily a billionaire who is a free speech absolutist jumped in and bought Twitter.
So you were fine when a privately owned company censored the shit out of anything that didn't back tbe liberal agenda....
....but now you have a problem with the same privately owned company not censoring anything?
Makes total sense.....you're definitely not being swayed by one side of this debate at all.[/quote]
No, I don’t have a problem Elon doing whatever he wants. It’s his company now, well technically not yet but it’s looking like a done deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro