Bullet21XD wrote:Yeah, marketing hype.
soolong wrote:Can you answer this? Remington Hypersonic shells #2 shot you have a choice of 3in 1 1/8 or 1 1/4 load. They advertise 1700 fps second for both. I don't see this as possible. Or maybe they are just stating that it is a minimum of 1700 fps but to reach over 1700 fps is a stretch. Just thought somebody may have an explanation besides pure marketing hype. Thoughts?
Nershi wrote:Thanks for the info guys.
I have also heard that fps is only measured at the muzzle and the fps out 30 yards will be very different even between shells that have the same advertised fps at the muzzle. Just hear-say so I have no idea if there is any truth to that.
Return to “Firearms, Ammo & Gear Discussion”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests