Here in redwood we have 3 good falls in town, this one that was I was at yesterday is the smallest. There is one half azz falls also that was blasted for some reason and is more of a whitewater rapids now.Fish Felon wrote:That's a bad ass falls. I used to live about a five minute bike ride from Minnehaha Falls = overrated. When I dated the chick from Gaylord, one i actually kind of miss, she introduced to Minneopa Falls. I think it was at peak the times I saw it but it was more impressive than Minnehaha imo.
Starting in the late 1800's up through 1930 the city of Minneapolis and it's residents were freaking obsessed with getting Minnehaha Falls to always have a consistent flow throughout the summer. There was some event the city got in the 1890's that was the first thing of any prestige and they thought it was going to put Minneapolis on the map. Something like a World's Fair at that time, but not the world's fair. It was in August and it was the first time a sitting president came to MN.....and the Falls were basically bone dry....the president (who's name escapes me right now) said to the STrib or the paper that preceeded it [paraphrasing], "How completely unimpressive," the Falls were and that was the start with the obsession to have Minnehaha creek provide a constant rate of flow. So they dug out and dredged most of a shallow cattail filled wetland down to over a 30' lake to create a water source, today known as "Lake Nokomis." The cattail slough that was 3' deep at most where there was pockets of water actually used to be bigger at over 300 acres. They filled in a hundred and dug out the other two hundred to make the lake......which was supposed to retain enough water to supply a constant rate to the Falls all summer.
It didn't work....nothing did. In over 40 years of trying the city and it's residents never came close to achieving their goal. One of the few old time man industrializing nature stories I've ever heard about that ended in failure. History is made up of success stories. We tend to pedestalize older generations for their almost otherworldly accomplishments at that time.....but very few of their colossal failures became a part of the written record of events for back then.
I think it's awesome they wanted to do it and failed....miserably. I think the Victorian era view of conservation was better than today's view. Back then they would have never dreamed of saving a piece of ground to let it just sit there and rot....to have something owned by the public go fallow in only a handful of years, and then rarely be tended to in order to keep it productive.
The Victorian view of conservation was that man wasn't meant to save nature....man was meant to improve upon nature.
They did some bad ass shit back then.
Charles Loring was the first director of the Minneapolis Park Board. That's why the city's central park was renamed after him. Loring park was originally Central Park....just like in NYC and other cosmopolitan cities....they all had a central park.
Loring didn't like the loud, aggressive, obnoxious, yet diminutive red [pine] squirrels that roamed the city and were nuisances to park goers......
.....so he brought in the gray squirrel through a collaboration with the state of Kansas.
Yes, the gray squirrel is an invasive species in MN that is here only as a result of the Minneapolis park board.
Mf'n moonrise gets them snapping everytime.Nershi wrote:Some moonrise slime to start the morning.
[img]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210613/29c2053b63fe9061fd3b5de54133c8a1.jpg[/img]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Return to “MNFOWL's Misguided Children”
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 147 guests