Anyone who wants to throw out "blah blah blah" about the unvaccinated.......
.....better come at me with some actual figures on the unvaccinated.
Read everything on this chart:
Why isn't there a category for me?
AKA
"NEVER GETTING VACCINATED"
but all you pro-vaxxers can keep referring to me as "unvaccinated" or....I'm not really an anti-vaxxer......if you want to infect some gene splicing questionable mRNA shit, go ahead and roll the dice. Anyone who wants it should have it available.
Just quit lying about it being effective.
Since a shitload of people are fully vaccinated yet the chart for cases and positive case rate:
Is clearly the worst it's ever fukcing been, by far. When the entire population was unvaccinated and next to no one had antibodies yet.....somehow that first big wave we fared better than we are now when the vast majority is fully vaccinated.
Quick question for you pro-vaxxers......you know how you keep on claiming the pandemic is a raging fire amongst the unvaccinated?
Why didn't this same fire we got raging now.....well, if it's raging amongst only the unvaccinated and there's like less than 30% of the population not fully vaccinated.....
....how come it didn't do that when that figure was a 100%?
If 30% is "still plenty of easy covid targets" then what the fukc happened when it was 100% easy targets? Covid saw we were too vulnerable and decided to give us a head start so it'd be more sporting?
Even when trying to make the numbers work out for the other side of the argument....having it be 150% more contagious amongst only 30% of the population doesn't add up for things being the at the new low.
Here's what I'd love to have a pro-vaxxer from the medical community answer for me.....
What are the hospitalization rates and death rates for unvaccinated people under age 65 in MN?
Under the definition:
"Fully vaccinated is defined as 14 or more days after they have completed all recommended doses of a COVID-19 vaccine."
Recommendation doses = boosters
So if you've received both doses of Moderna or Pfizer....guess what!?
The state of MN counts you and me the same.....we're both "Not Fully Vaccinated"
Now ask yourself why they would do it that way........what do you think would be easier to count/compile/tabulate/track. I'll put it this way....
There are two large groups of people in MN that need to be accounted for. For the first group you need to check a slow to update centralized state website.....and you need to check it for several things over and over again for two week to month long time periods. I.E. just because it lists something on there today doesn't necessarily mean it's correct. That information could just be waiting to update....so if someone tested positive you'll need to check it right away, and then one or multiple more times within a month, and it'll be like 95% accurate at that point. Once you know you're looking at the updated info.....now you have to check several dates, and which one of three different tags might have occurred on those dates....let's call em "brands." One brand you immediately mark it as "not fully vaccinated" if you see it...it'll coincide with a single date event in most cases. Yeah, that one is no good so we're going to throw all those ones out....they don't count. Then with the other two, there has to be three date events for all three....if there is, you need to check the last date and then the date of the positive test, and if it's within 14 or more days of each other......so if they're 13 or less days apart....those ones also don't count.
The other group of people is simply the list of people not in the system....they've never been entered, have done nothing to get their name into the system, and most likely never will. So the second thing of people is technically already counted......if you could somehow cross reference a list of state citizens with the other centralized data base, in the year 2022
So which group would you pick to tabulate?
The state of MN picked the first one.
Now what side do you think they error on.....keeping in mind these are state workers, flaming libs working at the MDH, as pro-vaccine as it gets.......
So I'm sure they'd never say, "fuggit," and chalk up a potential breakthrough case that makes the vaccine better while doing the chore of trying to determine between "fully vaccinated" or "not fully vaccinated."
Do you know why you'll never see any actual reports for "unvaccinated?"
Because the medical community is a bunch of narcissistic fukcs and liars and chooses to create shitty science, and unethically ruin good science.....
AKA
You won't find any actual "unvaccinated" figures because unvaccinated people are concentrated in age demographics and types of people (healthier) than the people who've taken one or more doses of the vaccine.
That'd be the flip side......to doing it....
If I wanted to be a lying, unethical, crooked fukc like those at the MN dept of Health and DELIBERATELY create a data set of numbers that DELIBERATELY misrepresent my agenda?
"Unvaccinated" and "Vaccinated" where the definition for vaccinated would be:
"Any person who has received one or more doses of any brand of vaccine is defined as "Vaccinated."
Even trying to be a fukc like the pro-vaxxers are and skew the numbers, my data set would still represent a less biased pair of sample groups.
And the numbers produced by anyone who had the time, money, determination, and pull to get them....
WOULD FUKCING CRUSH THE VACCINE FOR GOOD AS BEING THE WORTHLESS mRNA GORILLA GLUE IT IS.